|
112
PERSONNEL (APPEALS & APPLIED CONDITIONS
OF SERVICE)
SUB-COMMITTEE – 19 MARCH 2007
_______________________________________________________________________
|
Personnel (Appeals & Applied Conditions of Service) Sub-Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
Monday 19 March 2007 at 10 am |
|
|
|
|
|
Present: Councillors Hunter, McCormick (P), Forbes (for Nimmo), Snoddy and Stewart. |
|
|
|
|
|
Chair: Councillor Stewart presided. |
|
|
|
|
|
In attendance: Mr H McNeilly (for Head of Legal & Administration), Head of Organisational Development & Human Resources and Ms B McQuarrie (for Head of Organisational Development & Human Resources). |
|
|
|
|
|
Apologies: Councillors McCabe, Moran and Nimmo. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
following paragraphs are submitted for information only having been dealt
with under the powers delegated to the Sub-Committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
It was agreed in terms of Section 50(A)(4) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 as amended, that the public and press be excluded from the meeting for the following items on the grounds that the business involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 1 of Part I of Schedule 7(A) of the Act. |
|
|
|
|
248 |
Appeal
Against Dismissal: Employee in Property Services |
248 |
|
|
|
|
The Sub-Committee considered an appeal against dismissal on behalf of an employee in Property Services. The Sub-Committee adjourned at 11.35 am and reconvened at 11.55 am. The Sub-Committee decided that the appeal be not upheld, all as detailed in the appendix. |
|
|
|
|
249 |
Appeal
Against Dismissal: Employee in Property/Education Services |
249 |
|
|
|
|
The Sub-Committee considered an appeal against dismissal on behalf of an employee in Property/Education Services. The Sub-Committee adjourned at 1.08 pm and reconvened at 1.50 pm. The Sub-Committee decided that the appeal be upheld, all as detailed in the appendix. |
|
|
|
|
250 |
Grievance Appeal: Employees in
Education Services |
250 |
|
|
|
|
The
Sub-Committee considered a collective grievance appeal on behalf of a number
of employees in Education Services and decided that the appeal be not upheld,
all as detailed in the appendix. |
|